Hypertension is widely prevalent worldwide. It has been an important disease to cause death and disability from stroke and cardiovascular disease (CVD) worldwide [1]. According to the 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) clinical practice guidelines on hypertension, patient number with diagnosed and undetected hypertension is markedly increasing [2]. Results of the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) data showed that intensively controlled blood pressure could significantly reduce mortality and CVD events [3]. There has been a report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group on Hypertension [4].

Consequently, adequate treatment for hypertension can reduce cardiovascular mortality [5]. Currently, major categories of antihypertensive agents include diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCBs), renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors [angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB)].

For initial therapy for hypertension, beta-blockers have been prevalent since the 1960s. Due to a systematic review, beta-blockers showed significantly reduced stroke and cardiovascular events. However, they did not reduce congestive heart disease and all-cause mortality [6]. Among them, the clinical effect of beta-blockers was less than low-dose thiazides, ACE inhibitors, and CCB [6]. According to the Cochrane study, dual alpha and beta-blockers lowered BP for 6 / 4mmHg on average. Also, this effect was less than that of beta1-selective blockers [7]. Another Cochrane review revealed that beta1-selective blockers have a stronger lowering effect of 10 / 8mmHg. Furthermore, beta1-selective blockers reduced blood pressure (BP) to a greater degree in comparison with dual alpha and beta-blockers [8].

For general information on beta-blockers, propranolol has an affinity for beta1 and beta2 receptors as a non-selective beta-blocker [5]. Among beta-blockers, the most commonly used agent has been atenolol. Atenolol and bisoprolol preferentially interact with beta1 more than beta2 receptors as selective beta-blockers. Carvedilol exhibits affinity for beta1 and alpha receptors as dual alpha and beta-blocker [5]. There was a report comparing the effect of carvedilol and bisoprolol for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) [9]. As a result, the prescription of beta-blockers reduced all-cause mortality (HR 0.59), and two agents had comparable effects.

Secondly, diabetes has been also crucial disease in the world, frequently associated with high blood pressure. For patients with type1 and 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM and T2DM), hypertension has been a very common complication [10,11]. To continue good BP control can bring effect for reducing the macrovascular and microvascular complications [12,13]. According to the guideline of the United States and Europe, the degree of reducing BP would become the main determinant of lowering cardiovascular risk in comparison with the administration of [2,14].

Among their guidelines, some antihypertensive agents have been considered to decrease cardiovascular events for diabetic patients, including thiazide-like diuretics, CCBs, ACE inhibitors, ARBs. ACE inhibitors and ARBs belong to the group of RAS inhibitors, which have been provided as first-line therapy for hypertensive diabetic patients.

There was a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to study the efficacy among RAS inhibitors and another antihypertensive [15]. From a total 16 trials with 35,052 patients, the result showed a rather lower relative risk (RR). They are all-cause death (RR 0.95), cardiovascular death (RR 0.84), the incidence of cardiovascular disease (RR 0.93), and incidence of renal dysfunction (RR 0.91), while there were no significant differences [15].

RAS inhibitors mainly include ACE inhibitors and ARBs and show the beneficial effect of reducing urinary albumin [16]. The presence of albuminuria has been estimated to be a risk factor for cardiovascular events [17]. Then, RAS inhibitors have been primarily the first-line antihypertensive for diabetic patients, because they have also improved insulin-resistant effect and Renoprotective effect [18]. From mentioned above, RAS inhibitors are recommended to provide patients who are diabetic hypertensive, associated with some renal function impairment such as proteinuria or microalbuminuria.

For hypertensive diabetic patients, there are reports of a meta-analysis of trials that compare RAS inhibitors and other category agents [19,20]. From the results, RAS inhibitors showed no better than other agents as a first-line antihypertensive agent for several markers. They include the degree of reducing cardiovascular death, all-cause death, the incidence of renal dysfunction and the incidence of cardiovascular disease. Their summarized effects were suggested to show lower risks, whereas statistically significant difference was not found [17,20]. These results were consistent with those of relevant major known guidelines [2,13,14].

There are some guidelines for adequate treatment for hypertensive patients with diabetes. Among them, RAS inhibitors have been recommended as first-line treatment [17,18]. From a statistic point of view, some cases show significant differences in certain research protocols. The probable factors would be in the following: i) comparison of RAS inhibitors with CCBs or with beta-blockers or diuretics, ii) proposed target blood pressure, iii) enough effect of assigned agents, iv) follow-up period of the protocol in the trials, v) included or excluded for patients with impaired renal function and vi) positive or negative for the history of the cardiovascular accident. Generally, the recommendation was almost based on the expected protective efficacy of RAS inhibitors over placebo medicine from diabetic nephropathy [17,18].

When a multidrug regimen can be used to achieve for the target BP, the administration of a RAS inhibitor to the protocol may be successful [20]. According to the research protocol, a protective effect for nephropathy of each agent would be considered [20,21]. Recently, the updated guidelines by the European Society of Cardiology and European Society of Hypertension (ESC/ESH) 2018 have included such clinical judgments [21].

For hypertensive patients with diabetes and albuminuria, the guidelines or statements showed the recommendation including ACE inhibitors or ARBs for the initial treatment of risk reduction against the progression of renal disease [21]. There has been some evidence for the judgment by some guidelines such as the 2017 American Hospital Association/American College of Cardiology Guidelines. However, the relevant recommendation has been as Class IIb, which means a weak degree [2,21].

In summary, recent topics concerning the treatment for hypertensive patients with diabetes and its complications would be described. As an antihypertensive agent, RAS agents such as ACE inhibitors and ARBs have been recommended for expecting the preventive effects. This article may hopefully become some reference for clinical practice and research.